Tuesday, February 27, 2024

Safety Net

A bookshelf in a public library, with a fire roaring behind it.

This story was funded by our members. Join Longreads and help us to support more writers.

Lisa Bubert | Longreads | February 27, 2024 | 3,584 words (13 minutes)

It’s my turn to wake up Carmen. (No, that’s not her real name.) Carmen has been living on the street longer than I’ve been a librarian, and her elderly head is currently resting on a study desk even though we’ve all already asked her to keep her head up. It’s our least popular and most enforced rule: we don’t allow people to sleep in the library. We know you’re tired, we know it’s warm, we know it feels safe. But someone who is dying also looks like someone who is sleeping, and we’ve all seen our share of overdoses. Also, if one person is allowed to do it, everyone will do it. So, no sleeping. 

Carmen’s back and neck are perpetually bent at a right angle, her left shoulder humping up cockeyed thanks to years of untreated scoliosis. What she lacks in vitality, though, she makes up for in volatility; the last time we asked her not to sleep in the library, she called my coworker a “fat Jew.” I seem to set her off in particular. She accused me of being a Russian spy when we met, and if she sees my car driving down the street, she will throw a middle finger my way without hesitation.

Only one staff member has managed to break through Carmen’s shell after years of persistence, but they’re on lunch. I check the camera one more time. Carmen’s head is still down, arms wrapped around her ears like a kid in grade school. No time like the present. 

I approach, our guard watching nearby. She’s already called him a pussy once; he’s not interested in hearing it again. I keep a table between myself and Carmen. I tap my fingers on the wood, near where she lays her head. I say her name.

She throws her head up. “What!” Just like that. No question, just exclamation.

“We’re just checking on you. You have to keep your head up while you’re in the library.” 

“Why!”

“We need to know that you’re okay, that you’re not having a medical emergency.”

A flinty stare. “I need to keep my head up so you know I’m not having a medical emergency,” she repeats. 

“Yes,” I say. “It’s the agreement of being in the library.” 

She stares me down, crosses her arms. I back up. 

“You won’t have to worry about that,” she says. “I won’t be back.” She says this like a rich woman who has been served the wrong meal at a fancy restaurant. Julia Roberts with all her shopping bags on Rodeo Drive. Big mistake. Huge. 

“Okay,” I say. 

She says something as I walk away, something meant to antagonize, to get me to come back and fight with her. I ignore it. I don’t give a shit what she says as long as she doesn’t give us a reason to kick her out. Summer is coming on, and it’s hot out. Back at my desk, I check the camera. Her head stays up. 

She comes back the next day. 


I am a public librarian. I currently work in an urban system, though I’ve done time in the ’burbs. We have a food bank to our left, court-ordered counseling clinics and shelters across the street, a fast-food chicken joint to the right, and a bus stop out front. 

A good number of our regulars are either unhoused people waiting on shelter or people who have shelter but spend all day at the library because it’s safer. We know most of their names—if not their government names, their street names. Possum, Shorty Red, Baby Doll. If we don’t know those, we’ll come up with our own nicknames: Sparkle Boots, Hot Wheels, Orange Dreds. We’re not trying to be disrespectful; we’re trying to keep up with who is in the building. If we’ve learned anything about keeping the peace, we’ve learned that it’s imperative to know who’s here, who’s not, who has beef, who’s in hiding. 

The best security is to look people in the eye when they come in, say hello, give a nod that says I see you. To find out their name and give your name in return. To give grace because that’s all some of our people have. 

We do have a guard, but it’s dangerous to get too lazy about that guard. They’re there as a deterrent. A uniform, a badge, making rounds. The guard is unarmed, which is how we prefer it. The best security is to look people in the eye when they come in, say hello, give a nod that says I see you. To find out their name and give your name in return. To give grace because that’s all some of our people have. 

When you don’t have money or a place to stay, but you do have an addiction, an abusive partner, or an exploitative job, you need to know where you can go. The church serves hot lunch on Mondays. The empty park behind the old Hardee’s is a good place to set up camp. The library will let you stay all day as long as you don’t sleep and you don’t have outbursts. Balance a book on your lap; if you’re gonna doze, make sure you doze sitting up. The librarians know who you are. The librarians see you.


I never wanted to be a librarian. 

I was a kid who loved reading, but I liked writing even more. And while I liked helping people, I preferred when it came with an adrenaline rush—which didn’t square with my impression of libraries. I had fallen victim to the false, if enduring, tropes about librarianship: shushing people, valuing quiet contemplation, wearing combed hair in a tidy bun over a well-made dress, relishing the academic predictability of each civilized day. 

As it turns out, though, graduating from college in the middle of a recession changes things: the public library offered me a slightly-higher-than-minimum-wage part-time job I immediately accepted. Turning that part-time job into a full-time job, would mean getting a master’s degree in Library Science; however, being a graduate student also let me place my already towering student loans into a deferment that wouldn’t collect interest. So, to library school I went. I got the degree. I got the full-time job. I also imagined a distant future in which I quit the library, my temporary placeholder career, for something much more fitting for me. Emergency services, social work, counseling, maybe vagabondry. 

That I have been ambivalent about my librarianship career surprises most people. But you’re so good at what you do! You’ve always seemed like someone who has it figured out! It wasn’t until I started working at the library I’m at now—where I can have the nonemergency line on speed dial and Narcan in my backpack—that I felt like I found my place. There is no quiet here, no predictability to the days. There is instead a backdrop of low-grade chaos, funny in its Southern volatility. Telling a patron he can’t burn his trash behind the library building even if that’s how they do it in Mississippi. Telling another patron to lower their voice, only for them to apologize and deny in the same breath. Being accused of being a Russian spy, obviously. I mean, where else am I going to get stories like this? 

I may never have wanted to be a librarian, but I love this job. This specific job. Not because of any kind of noble commitment to knowledge or love of books. I love it because every day requires me to meet humanity face to face. It reminds me that I am actually living in an actual society where I am responsible to other people. In one hour on the desk, I can help a child find every single book on frogs that we have and then turn around and give a tissue to a grown man sobbing over his deceased wife. I can give a tampon to a woman hiding in the restroom because she’s been living on the streets. I can listen to the HOA chair complain about being booted from our larger meeting room because we needed it to host FEMA after a tornado tore up another neighborhood a block over. Patrons recognize me everywhere I go in my neighborhood, like a minor celebrity. Library lady, library lady. They know I’m nice, that I try not to judge. They know I can be trusted. They know I’m good in an emergency. And these days, when you work as a librarian in America, there is no lack of emergencies. 


Vulnerability doesn’t fit into America’s beloved bootstrapping ethos, and so Americans will try very hard not to see their vulnerable neighbors. When we walk down a street and see someone lying on a sewer grate to keep warm, the polite thing to do isn’t to check on the person—it’s to pretend we don’t see them and keep walking. If the person sits up and asks for help, we become momentarily deaf and walk faster. Anything to get away from the uncomfortable truth that our safety net is failing. 

We love to remember the troops, never forget 9/11, be #BostonStrong, #ParklandStrong, #VegasStrong, #UvaldeStrong, etc., etc. Americans supporting Americans in their time of need surely proves that we are a nation of grace, a nation that takes care of its own, at least until the next hashtag comes along. 

Some say we are a nation that cares for its “deserving” own and that deserving is defined by those who are in power, who are not vulnerable, who have wealth, privilege, status. I agree with this critique, but I’d posit another angle. We don’t choose who to help based on who deserves it; we choose who to help based on the amount of control we have over that help. We are, after all, a business-oriented nation. We love a deadline. 


I am in a meeting with coworkers about programming when we hear a woman screaming at someone in the public restroom. I hustle out to the floor to see what’s going on. Our security officer is there, calling the police. A woman’s voice screams, at him, at everyone, at no one. The smell of burning. Two old ladies sit across from us, frozen at the computer. 

“Are we in danger?” they ask. 

“No,” I say, looking at the security officer. He doesn’t say anything. 

The woman comes out with all her things. She has been caught bathing in the sink; the burning smell is from her curling iron burning synthetic hair as she restyled her wig. The security officer follows her out while the woman continues to scream. The old ladies remain frozen. 

This scenario is small potatoes. An angry woman in the bathroom, embarrassed at being caught in a private moment. We’ve dealt with heavier issues by far. Still, my stomach hurts the rest of the afternoon, adrenaline running for no reason. The week thus far has been a bad one; one man threatened one of our regulars over money owed, saying he was going to put a pistol in his mouth the next time he saw him. The heat wave is waving, bad drugs are on the street. Everyone coming inside is passing out. So much nervous energy, too many people in one place, too many people we’ve never seen before, whose stories we don’t know. The week before, a man twice my size went from zero to 60 on me because the computers were full and he needed to fill out a job application. He called my coworker a bougie bitch with fake braids; he screamed at me about how he had a life and he didn’t give a shit what we said. Fuck you, you fucking bitch, I don’t give a fuck if you call the cops. We’d all been on high alert so long that it felt like we lived there. 

So much nervous energy, too many people in one place, too many people we’ve never seen before, whose stories we don’t know.

After the woman from the bathroom leaves, I go work the reference desk. I tell my coworker (the one with the bougie braids) that the situation had made me nauseous and we laugh over it because yeah, way worse things have happened and we’ve dealt with them. I don’t know, I say. Just too much in general, I guess. 

Thirty minutes later, I’m checking social media and I see a news report about a shooting at another branch. We’ll learn later that two teens in the restroom shot each other in the legs trying to settle a dispute, but in the moment, all that’s being reported is “shooting in progress.” We try to get in contact with the staff at that branch to get any word. I text the children’s librarian, the teen librarian; my coworker calls the circulation supervisor. Finally, an email comes from admin confirming that a shooting did happen and that no staff or other patrons were hurt. We are relieved and not relieved. When my coworker comes back from lunch, I tell her what happened and she shakes her head. 

“Bullets don’t have eyes.” 


I used to think a librarian’s most important job was to protect intellectual freedom. We must be militant against censorship in all its forms; that’s what was drilled into our heads in library school. It was always taught in a historical sense—the book-burning Nazis, the war propaganda, McCarthyism—something our professional forebears had battled before and firmly defeated. We protégés were to remain on guard for all the ways censorship could crop up in modern times: rating systems for children’s books, “restricted” sections, and insidious self-censorship where the librarian opts not to place material in a collection, anticipating backlash. 

Books might be banned in some very rare and unfortunate circumstances, but more often they were “challenged,” where someone levels an accusation at a book and library leadership is compelled to reconsider its inclusion in the collection. Most times, library leadership would decide that, yes, the original collection decision had been correct. Or maybe it was correct but the book should be recatalogued into a different section, such as the usual case of young adult books that flirt with adult material. Only in extremely rare cases would library leadership actually pull a book from a collection. 

That’s what we thought, at least. Never could we have imagined that state governments would send “approved” lists for librarians to purchase from. Or pursue criminal charges for a librarian who ignores the list. Where were those scenarios in library school? At the time, we’d almost pined for that kind of drama—the good old days, when someone would challenge a book and the community would rise up against the challenge and the library would remain victorious, respected. Are these the new good old days? Is this how the story ends? Most of us are fleeing the profession, seeking greener pastures where the pay is better and the shift ends at five o’clock. 


My mind is constantly on a loop, evaluating incident reports, what could have gone worse, what could have gone better. I watch the camera, I make the rounds, I read body language. I can hear a fight before it starts. I wonder if today will be the day someone goes from desperate to violent. I stay vigilant. 

I hate how much of my job is taken up by surveillance. It makes me feel like a warden. But if we’re not vigilant, we miss important things. Like two boys pushing another boy into the restroom before gunshots ring out from inside. 

To be a public servant in America is to contend with a fair amount of trauma. The institutions are collapsing, and public librarians, especially, have a front row seat to the fallout. Every day, the collapse comes to our door and sets up camp. Because when the social safety net fails you—and it will fail you—you can still come to the library. As a result, we librarians are armored up for a job we didn’t expect.

Last night, I dreamed about escorting people out of the library. One woman suspended for a year for grabbing people and trying to hold them close to her chest; another man suspended for screaming in anger after receiving the help he requested. Dreams, but not too far from the truth. I wake up feeling rattled. I used to be able to shake off the unpleasant parts of the job—kicking people out for becoming unruly, talking someone down from anger, staying calm while a patron seizes on the floor, preparing to perform a sternal rub on a suspected overdose. But we have been short-staffed, the summer has been hot, and everyone feels pressure. 

We are late to our desk shifts, hurrying over from the last thing we were doing, sighing deep as the long hour passes. Keep an eye on that man, he might be watching porn. This guy is filling out SNAP forms; I got him on the application but he says he doesn’t know how to use a computer well. This old woman needs to print coupons from her email once she figures out how to sign in to her email. I already told that guy to lower his voice. She says the dog is a service dog. 

We shrug. We pick our battles. We’ll be back tomorrow.


Before libraries received over 600 book challenges from 11 people across the country, before librarians were doxed and our lives threatened online, before states passed laws to jail us if we did not comply, before patrons overdosed in the stacks, I thought the most important part of the job was to get children to read. 

Did I mention I’m a children’s librarian? I am. 

And the most important part of the job is getting children to read. But not just to read—to imagine, envision, and dream. We place just the right book in just the right child’s hands not just so they’ll grow intellectually, keep up in school, compete in the job market, etc. We want the child to read and comprehend what they’re reading because we need that child to grow into somebody who can imagine a better future. This child needs not only to be able to imagine all the things that haven’t yet been imagined before, but they need to be able to go out and build them. You can’t build what you can’t imagine. You can’t imagine if you’re never given the freedom to read and learn and dream. 

If I cut through the noise of book challenges and legal censorship and failing safety nets, I can still remember that the most important part of my day is when a child brings me a stack of books to check out and we marvel at them together and I ask which one they are most excited to read and their answer is all of them. This scenario still happens—it happens every day. 

The most important part of my job is to make the library a safe space. One where kids burst through the door and go running with glee to the children’s area so they can say hello to whoever is at the desk. One where a patron can have a full metal meltdown about the state of the world and still be given resources to find housing, a shower, a meal. One where someone can come in blasted high for years and then return the next day sober and clean, ensconcing themselves in the safety of the books to stay that way. 

Libraries are on the frontlines of so many wars—the war against censorship, the war against the erosion of personal privacy, the war against illiteracy, the war against fascism and the crumbling of democracy. Put it all together and we’re fighting one big war—the war against despair. 

People often ask me if I’m afraid to go to work. God no, I tell them. I’d be more terrified if I didn’t work here. Call it exposure therapy: the thing you fear becomes less scary when you face it every day. Every day, librarians face despair in all its forms. Every day we return to the job—and cut through that despair—is a win. No, we weren’t taught to do this in library school. But this is the duty that calls. Love and strength to those who answer.


I have a favorite patron. I know I shouldn’t have favorites, but I do. I tell him he’s my favorite but I don’t think he believes me. Perhaps he thinks I tell everyone that. I do not. 

I love him because he reminds me of my uncle, ragged and worn but loving. He comes in every day, whether it’s a good day because he’s sober or a bad day because he’s not. We have a little game we play: if one of us sees the other from across the library, we will stop what we’re doing and wait until the other notices. When we do both finally see each other, we wave our arms high in the air like we’re trying to send the biggest hello, I love you across the expanse. Think Forrest Gump waving at Lieutenant Dan, that big goofy smile. That’s me when I see Derek. (Again, not his real name.) That’s Derek when I confirm the game is still on. 

“How you doin’, darlin’?” He comes over and asks. 

“I’m good. You?” 

“I’m…” He pauses and thinks. And every time, he says the same thing: 

“I’m blessed.”


Lisa Bubert is a writer and librarian based in Nashville, Tennessee. Her work has appeared in The Rumpus, Texas Highways, Washington Square Review, and more.

Editor: Peter Rubin

Copyeditor: Krista Stevens

Get the Longreads Top 5 Email

Kickstart your weekend by getting the week’s very best reads, hand-picked and introduced by Longreads editors, delivered to your inbox every Friday morning—and keep up with all our picks by subscribing to our daily update.



from Longreads https://ift.tt/ZXGaqcA

Check out my bookbox memberships! 3, 7, or 15 vintage books a month sent to organization of your choice, or to yourself!
https://ift.tt/U2w3WL5

Monday, February 26, 2024

The “Disney Adult” Industrial Complex

Disney adults are hardcore fans of everything Disney, from film franchises to theme parks. Amelia Tait takes a closer look at this often mocked and misunderstood demographic, which, according to her survey of more than 1,300 self-identifying Disney adults from around the world, is typically female and aged 25-44. They are well-educated, while about half align with the political left. Many seek out the Disney experience because it provides a community, creates family bonds, and is “psychologically beneficial.” But the Disney entertainment and marketing machine has also always been about hyper-consumption—and for some individuals, embedded in their lives at birth.

Whether Disney adults are embarrassing or enchanting is largely a matter of opinion. What is missing from endless comment sections is the fact that they are a creation of the Walt Disney Company – a character constructed just as carefully as Elsa or Donald Duck. Disney does not hide its desire to create lifelong consumers. In 2011, Disney representatives visited new mothers in 580 maternity wards across the US, gifting them bodysuits and asking them to sign up for DisneyBaby.com. In 2022, the company announced plans to build residential “Storyliving” communities across America, with special neighbourhoods for those aged 55 and up.

Over the past 100 years, the Walt Disney Company has entwined itself with our families, memories and personal histories. In many ways, Disney is a religion that one is born into, the same way a 15th-century English baby was predestined to be baptised Catholic. Choice doesn’t necessarily come into it – we see Mickey Mouse around us like our ancestors saw the cross; a symbol that both 18-month-olds and 80-year-olds recognise. But if we accept that Disney adults were created, rather than spontaneously generated, then why are we scrutinising the congregation instead of the church?



from Longreads https://ift.tt/SJ3OV06

Check out my bookbox memberships! 3, 7, or 15 vintage books a month sent to organization of your choice, or to yourself!
https://ift.tt/U2w3WL5

A Rescue Dog Saved Him From Addiction

It all started in 2016 with Honey, an eight week-old German Shepherd puppy given four months to live. At that time, Mike Favor was newly sober after 13 years of active cocaine addiction. He didn’t think he was capable of caring for himself much less another being, but Honey changed all that. Today, his rescue Staten-Island dog rescue, “Freedom Home” specializes in matching pitbulls and drug addicts—two “misunderstood breeds.”

When Mr. Favor started Pitbulls and Addicts, he had ambitious plans to house dogs as well as people in recovery from substance abuse. The dogs, it turned out, were the easy part.

“I’ve been robbed,” he said. “I let people sleep on couches. I put people in hotel rooms. I took guys under my wing for many, many, many months.” He suspects that someone deliberately started a fire that burned down much of the shelter in 2019.

He concedes now that he tried to do more than he could handle. “In the beginning, I was trying to make this visionary dream, just in a rush,” he said. “And it just set me back.”

“I’ve been screwed over way too many times by the humans,” he said. “But when somebody turns to me, I have open arms.”



from Longreads https://ift.tt/SrWzt5B

Check out my bookbox memberships! 3, 7, or 15 vintage books a month sent to organization of your choice, or to yourself!
https://ift.tt/U2w3WL5

Saturday, February 24, 2024

The Wild West of NBA Jump Balls

If you want to make a sports fan happy, give them a deep dive into a goofy pool. To wit: Ben Dowsett going nearly 5,000 words on the jump ball, that contested toss that has started every game of basketball since 1891. Micro-analyzing the tradecraft used by both referees and players, Dowsett crams the piece with GIFs and videos aplenty to illustrate why it takes more than height to win the tip.

Every ref develops their own nuanced style. Crawford had a method of moving his head side to side, ostensibly checking all 10 players, before suddenly tossing the ball up with two hands. Rush would talk to the jumpers, then toss mid-sentence to surprise them; Javie and current NBA ref czar Monty McCutchen would also bounce the ball while talking, randomizing their bounce height and the number of bounces to keep players guessing.

Vaden would wait until both jumpers were set, then rock forward on his feet as if to throw the ball—typically fooling both players and getting them on their toes. “As soon as they both rocked back and got low, I would throw it,” Vaden says. Zach Zarba, one of today’s elite NBA officials, who has called several consecutive Finals, uses a similar extra pause.



from Longreads https://ift.tt/CjFzL82

Check out my bookbox memberships! 3, 7, or 15 vintage books a month sent to organization of your choice, or to yourself!
https://ift.tt/vYQ9kWd

Friday, February 23, 2024

Inside Ukraine’s Wartime Salons

“Does beauty even have a place in a society at war?” For many women in Ukraine, the answer is yes. In this story for Allure, Sophia Panych highlights the beauty salons that have persevered over the last two years—many of which have moved into underground basements that double as shelters—and writes an inspiring piece about courage, community, and resistance in a time of war.

“An air alert is sounded when airplanes with possible weapons take off somewhere in Russia; an air alert doesn’t scare anyone anymore,” explains Borodina. It’s at this point that some Ukrainians who find themselves in public spaces go through a series of calculations, not all of which are based in fact or official protocols, attempting to rationalize the risk. “When a missile launch is recorded, you receive an air-raid alert on your phone, but even then Ukrainians don’t immediately seek shelter,” Borodina continues. “You have to find out where the launches are coming from. If it is the Caspian Sea, we know it will take about 50 minutes to fly to Kyiv. So I have the opportunity to finish this Zoom, finish my manicure, and then, in 30 minutes, if [the missile is] suddenly directed to Kyiv or if it doesn’t get shot down, I move.”



from Longreads https://ift.tt/47poTOi

Check out my bookbox memberships! 3, 7, or 15 vintage books a month sent to organization of your choice, or to yourself!
https://ift.tt/9NpYenj

The Top 5 Longreads of the Week

A nuclear submarine moves toward the camera, set against a deep blue background

This story was funded by our members. Join Longreads and help us to support more writers.

In this week’s edition:

• A front-row seat to the US immigration crisis
• A thoughtful, warts-and-all profile of a civil rights icon
• A rare look inside a nuclear submarine
• A new way to cope with frightening change
• A conservative fever dream dressed up as summer school

1. A Family Ranch, Swallowed Up in the Madness of the Border

Eli Saslow | The New York Times | February 18, 2024 | 4,159 words

In December, Tucson’s Border Patrol saw nearly 20,000 migrants each week, marking a 300 percent surge from the previous year. Just south, near the US-Mexico border, lies Chilton Ranch: a sprawling expanse of 50,000 cattle-grazing acres in the Arizona desert owned by the same family for four generations and currently managed by Jim and Sue, a couple in their 80s. Five-and-a-half miles of their ranch run along the border wall. Here, footprints in the dirt reveal tales of survival and desperation. Accompanied by Erin Schaff’s emotive photography, Eli Maslow’s dispatch from this family ranch is masterfully reported, showing what its owners and cowboys encounter each day and night: Young children screaming for help, or arriving at their doorstep, their parents dead. Guides paid by the Sinaloa cartel, leading people through one of numerous gaps in the wall. Women who’ve been assaulted, mistaking their home for a Border Patrol station. A pregnant Sudanese woman, possibly in labor, exposed to the cold on a 36-degree night. Migrants, from all over the world, caught on camera footage traversing some of the 150 smuggling trails on the property. As many as 250 people a day wander onto their ranch from remote entry points—a microcosm of a nation facing an immigration crisis and humanitarian disaster—and the Chiltons are in the midst of it all. While Maslow paints a dismal bigger picture, the ordinary individuals in this story show compassion, even in the threat of their own safety and security. Many pieces on immigration feel abstract, impersonal; this is quite the opposite. —CLR

2. The Redemption of Al Sharpton

Mitchell S. Jackson | Esquire | February 21, 2024 | 9,471 words

Evolution never happens in a vacuum. At its grandest scale, it’s a response to a complex web of environmental and internal stimuli. At the humbler scale of a single human being over the course of their life, it’s . . . well, it’s pretty much the same. Take Al Sharpton. The child preacher turned activist that many of us first met in the ’80s—he of the tracksuits and the press conferences—seems far different than the Al Sharpton of today, an eminence grise of the civil rights movement. But how much of that is a change in the man himself, and how much is the context that has accumulated around him? Mitchell S. Jackson never comes out and asks that question directly, but his long, fascinating profile of Sharpton teases out an answer nonetheless. Over the course of a summer, Jackson spends untold hours with Sharpton, and unspools those hours in a recursive series of vignettes, each one taking the measure of the man in a new and surprising way. One of Jackson’s many writerly gifts is that he’s always present in a piece, but never overwhelms it; here that makes him crucial to the profile’s warts-and-all approach. Yes, he contends, the Tawana Brawley debacle remains a blemish. Yes, the Sharpton of long ago maybe had a kiss of hucksterism. Also, though: yes, Sharpton changed irrevocably at a certain point. And yes, the affectations that might have arched your eyebrow have stories behind them, and those stories might just change your mind the way they changed Jackson’s. Al Sharpton has given no shortage of time to reporters over the years, and this profile doubtless serves him the way they all have. But in taking stock of the man’s evolution, and how that has ultimately determined his larger impact, it might also be the truest, fullest profile of them all. —PR

3. Life Aboard a Nuclear Submarine as the US Responds to Threats Around the Globe

Adam Ciralsky | Vanity Fair | February 15, 2024 | 6,598 words

I can’t even imagine the amount of paperwork necessary for Adam Ciralsky and photographer Philip Montgomery to spend time on the USS Wyoming, one of the nation’s 14 submarines carrying nuclear weapons. As Ciralsky writes, “The number of civilians who had been given this level of access was roughly the same as that who have walked on the moon.” Our intrinsic voyeurism means weapons of mass destruction hold a morbid fascination, and Ciralsky builds on this with descriptions that imply dark deeds and espionage—boarding the submarine on a stormy night amid high Atlantic seas. It all feels very Cold War. However, the people he then meets break character, coming across as pleasant, even humorous (and in some cases, very young). But a steely resolve is also apparent. Chilling lines in this piece emphasize the dark times we are in. Off the submarine, Ciralsky meets experts such as navy captain Dan Packer, who reminds him, “2027 is the year Xi Jinping said they need to be ready to go to war,” and General Anthony Cotton, the head of US Strategic Command, who alludes to other threats from Russia, North Korea, Iran, and armed groups like the Houthis in Yemen, Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syria, and the Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq. These submarines are powerful chess pieces on this tense global stage. In position, ready to move. They are designed as a deterrent, but the chess masters are still poised to play: “If you ever wonder if people would be ready to employ these weapons, the answer is yes,” Ciralsky is told. Perhaps the reason a Vanity Fair reporter was allowed access to the Wyoming—and to literally sleep next to Trident missiles—is just another move in the game. —CW

4. What Happens When We Stop Remembering?

Heidi Lasher | Orion Magazine | February 13, 2024 | 3,346 words

My favorite uncle was diagnosed with dementia three years ago. His decline has been rapid: he went from someone who joked nonstop to being nearly incapable of speech. When I see him, I witness his ever-narrowing new normal. I remember the man who lived with us at various points in my life, the swimming outings, the movies we watched together, how he made me soup after his overnight shift when I left school sick. In this thoughtful essay at Orion, Heidi Lasher considers the concept of shifting baselines in relation to her father’s dementia. “Shifting baselines is the idea that each successive generation will accept as ‘normal’ an increasingly degraded and disorganized ecology, until at some point in the future, no one will remember what a healthy ecology looks and feels like,” she writes. In mulling our mutable climate, raising kids, and her parents’ declining health, she urges us to be present and to remember in the face of chaotic and frightening transition: “Social researcher Phoebe Hamilton Jones says the antidote to shifting baselines is found in our ability to pay attention and to call forth what once was.” We are not powerless in the face of change, Lasher reminds us. You can mourn what you had or cherish it—the choice is yours. —KS

5. An American Education: Notes from UATX

Noah Rawlings | The New Inquiry | February 19, 2024 | 6,839 words

If you’re not addicted to media discourse, I envy you. I also realize you might need some background before diving into this pick, so here goes: a couple of years ago, a collection of reactionary academics and journalists, hysterical about the purported “wokeness” of US higher education, decided to start their own university. It’s called the University of Austin, but it’s actually in Dallas, in an office complex owned by Harlan Crow, billionaire BFF and patron of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. UATX’s figurehead is ex-New York Times staffer Bari Weiss, who also runs The Free Press (“For Free People”), an online outlet that spends an inordinate amount of time clutching pearls about gender-affirming care for trans children. Many of UATX’s faculty and fellows have expressed support for Israel’s continuing bombardment of Gaza; at least one has couched the genocide as a matter of good versus evil. So. In this essay, which is as hilarious as it is rage-inducing, Noah Rawlings describes attending UATX’s “Forbidden Courses” summer program, which it launched in advance of actually enrolling students. Better Rawlings than I, because I would have lost my damn mind. Not when founding faculty member Peter Boghossian, who once accused his former employer, Portland State University, of being a “Social Justice factory” (quelle horreur) said he’s so good at jiu-jitsu that he could murder everyone on a bus carrying participants to the program’s commencement dinner. Not when Joe Lonsdale, who helped found Palantir, told students that the rise of AI would let humans do “more natural things” with their lives. Not when Weiss, when asked by a student why there aren’t any left-of-center faculty at a school that supposedly prides itself on illuminating truth through dialogue, suggested the left is just less interested in debate. No, I think I would have lost it when someone (Rawlings doesn’t say who) uttered the following: “If Simone de Beauvoir were alive right now, she would be very popular, like Jordan Peterson.” —SD


Audience Award

What editor’s pick was our readers’ favorite this week?

The Burgeoning Science of Search and Rescue

Sarah Scoles | Undark | January 22, 2024 | 3,875 words

Ever lost your way in the wilderness? In 2021, nearly 3,400 people got lost in a US national park. In the 2000s, a researcher named Robert Koester gathered and analyzed data on the behaviors of different types of people, from children to experienced hikers, who’ve wandered and gotten lost in the wild. In what direction do they go? How do geographic features and different terrains influence their movements? In this piece for Undark, Sarah Scoles reports on the growing science of “lost person behavior,” which in turn can inform the strategies of search-and-rescue missions. —CLR



from Longreads https://ift.tt/VXjpaq4

Check out my bookbox memberships! 3, 7, or 15 vintage books a month sent to organization of your choice, or to yourself!
https://ift.tt/9NpYenj

Thursday, February 22, 2024

The Redemption of Al Sharpton

Magazines have been writing about Al Sharpton for damn near 40 years. But the Al Sharpton of now is not the Al Sharpton of then, and Mitchell Jackson’s profile gets its arms around the civil rights activist with such totality that it’s hard to imagine anything short of a book-length biography could match it. It’s not the last word on a complicated man, but it’s perhaps the best.

What if Sharpton’s ultimate legacy is not some omnibus writ that the ill-intentioned—looking at you, SCOTUS—will work lifetimes to dismantle but his indefatigable insistence (he logs a staggering 250,000 to 300,000 air miles per year) on the overtruth that there never has been nor will be a post-racial America, least of all in the city that is its locus of power. It’s not the bright, tangible achievements of his forebears but the difficult, often fallible work of steadying a light that won’t let you look away.



from Longreads https://ift.tt/fElOc1C

Check out my bookbox memberships! 3, 7, or 15 vintage books a month sent to organization of your choice, or to yourself!
https://ift.tt/eqxk4rT